VMware ESX vs Microsoft Hyper-V
All other vStuff
0
On Gabes Virtual World I read an article with the title ‘Unbelievable Hyper-V performance ‘. At first I was a bit shocked by the title. Hyper-V good performance? That the complete opposite to my own experience with Microsofts virtualization attempt. But luckily what Gabe ment was ‘Unbelievable BAD Hyper-V performance ‘.
You can read the complete article here.
Conclusion
A max score of 1,875 VMs per core where VMware ESX on the same hardware does 3,5 VMs per core. Maybe the test is not 100% accurate but with these scores maybe someone should step up and do a real hypervisor performance comparison (same hardware, load, etc).
Related Posts:
- Using VMware and Veeam? Update VBR 9.5 to Update 3a now by Edwin Weijdema
- vSphere 5.5 End of Life: Now what? by Alex Muetstege
- Vembu Backup and DR Software - Revisited by Alex Muetstege
- VMGuru TV Episode 3 - Our VMworld 2020 recommendations by Anne Jan Elsinga
- VMGuru TV Episode 2: What if you need support? by Anne Jan Elsinga
Tags In
Erik Scholten
The founder and driving force behind VMGuru. With over 20 years experience in IT, he now works as a Cloud Management Specialist at VMware Benelux. He worked as technical consultant, pre-sales and solutions architect for several systems integrators.
He's a long time VMware VCP Data Center Virtualization, VCP Desktop, VCP Cloud Management & Automation, VCA, VSP and VTSP, vExpert Cloud (2017) and one of the few 10 times vExpert (2009 - 2018).
Related Posts
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.